用细致“心”保障春运“暖”——2023年铁路春运一线见闻******
新春走基层｜用细致“心”保障春运“暖”——2023年铁路春运一线见闻
随着疫情防控进入新阶段后的首个春运拉开帷幕，铁路客流快速攀升。铁路部门如何保障平安春运、有序春运、温馨春运？带着问题，记者走访了北京重要的铁路客站和铁路服务环节。
急客通道、医疗服务，春运“归途”很暖心
满载归心似箭的游子，驶向期待团圆的家乡。1月7日进入春运以来，北京各大铁路客站客流持续攀升。交通运输部的数据显示，预计今年春运期间客流总量约为20.95亿人次，恢复到2019年同期的70.3%。
“得益于前期充足准备，北京南站运行总体平稳有序。”中国铁路北京局集团有限公司北京南站客运车间党支部书记董芳说，车站实时分析客流需求，对于重点热门方向及时掌握车票预售和候补情况，梯次投放运力。
在北京南站进站口，一位旅客找到车站工作人员：“还有15分钟开车，请帮帮我。”在工作人员引导下，这位旅客通过“急客”通道顺利上车。
站台上，润秋服务组工作人员韩畅正推着残疾人旅客上车。“为旅客服务，我们没有终点。”韩畅说，每个“春运人”都全身心投入工作，用更细致的工作，保障旅客旅途暖心、安心。
据悉，今年春运期间，北京南站夜间不完全闭站，为需要候车休息的旅客划定休息区；联合北京佑安医院在候车厅开设医疗服务点，为有需要的乘客提供帮助；设置了去往北京各大火车站的乘车路线导航“小彩条”，为重点旅客提供便携式呼叫铃……
“暖心的服务让人安心。”从山东潍坊带孩子来北京看病的宋先生说，高铁线路越来越密，当天就能往返北京，希望兔年孩子康复，日子更好。
先“体检”再上线，高铁“医生”护列车安全
三年疫情，铁路客流骤降。不少车辆“趴”在车辆段没有上路，它们的维修保养工作做得如何？能否顺利通过春运“大考”？记者来到京津冀最大的动车组检修维修基地——中国铁路北京局集团有限公司北京动车段。
作为北京地区唯一的动车段，北京动车段配属动车组228列，负责京沪、京广、京张、京哈等线路动车组的检修调试和保养工作。
“别人过节放假，我们是越到节日越忙，天气越冷越忙。”北京动车段副段长魏巍带领记者来到检修车间，为保证动车组以最佳状态上线春运，段里早早就开始准备。
早上八点，技术员万奇鑫收拾好装备，开始进行检修。在高铁“医生”眼中，给列车“看病”是个“良心活”，每个环节缺一不可，要做到万无一失，必须怀着敬畏之心。
万奇鑫的小组今天要对列车进行空心轴探伤，空心轴对动车组安全运行影响巨大。以前检修时，靠老师傅用小锤敲打、听声判伤，现在使用超声波探伤器，更可靠更高效了。
“春运开始后，全所12条检修车道不停地‘翻台’。”万奇鑫说，随着和谐号、复兴号、复兴号智能动车组等多种车型上线运行，检修工作的挑战也更大了。技术人员要不断学习、增强本领，确保车辆健康、春运安全。
健康过大年 重温冬奥情 京张高铁“冰雪之旅”很热门
随着春运开启，京张高铁迎来北京冬奥会结束后首个滑雪热潮。
在清河站，不少旅客正在等待乘坐京张高铁D6715次列车，前往崇礼体验冰雪乐趣。中国铁路北京局集团有限公司清河站站长王小勇说，预计春运期间单日旅客发送量在2万人次到2.5万人次之间，将达到开站以来的最高峰。
在北京冬奥会的带动下，越来越多的中国人了解、喜欢上了冰雪运动。
“崇礼站开站一年来，客流逐步增加，今年元旦假期，单趟运送雪板的数量就达到将近100件，赶上周六日，列车还要重联运行。”北京客运段京张高铁列车长王亚丽说，为方便携带雪板的旅客，清河站在候车大厅增设了雪具托运点，方便旅客办理托运。
25岁的庞先生在上海工作，周末专门坐飞机到北京，从大兴机场换乘地铁到清河站后，转京张高铁抵达崇礼。“全程衔接顺畅，交通非常高效，我们周末滑完，周一就可以回去上班。”庞先生说。
回升的客流里，是悄然回归的暖意。2023年春运，带回了人们久违的烟火气，也重启了活力与希望。新的一年，必将更加美好。(新华社 陈旭、丁静、李溢春)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
